The owner of the Air Purifiers Superstore entered the air purifier business over 7 years ago when he discovered via an associate working at Nellis Air Force Base that certain chemicals, mainly barium salt and aluminum, were being dumped into the atmosphere. This program is now popularly known as "Chemtrails".   Unfortunately, after years of research, he discovered that Chemtrails were just the tip of the iceberg. This article will strive to expose the most dangerous mostly unreported threats to your health and offer real solutions.

Why would our government allow barium salt (absorbs moisture, may cause drought) and aluminum (reflects sun, harmful to living organisms) to be dumped into our atmosphere and enter into our environment?  We will answer that question at the end of this article, after we present our evidence. First, let us present our case.

What are Chemtrails?  They're "contrails from hell" that are created by chemicals added to the fuel of military and UN aircraft.  Regular contrails dissipate within seconds. Chemtrails linger for hours.  A recent Discovery Channel report for the first time discussed Chemtrails as there seems to be some kind of media blackout covering this phenomena.  Of course, the piece was mostly disinformation.  The fact that the Main Stream Media is now willing to at least discuss Chemtrails is a testament of the pressure provided by grassroots Internet attention that has been exposing the Chemtrail phenomena for over 9 years now. (See: Best Chemtrail Website) 

What can you do to protect yourself from Chemtrails?  Keep your immune system strong and use our heavy metal test kit to see if you have high levels of aluminum, Mercury, etc in your system.  If so, use one of our lab proven heavy metal detox products that have been clinically tested and proven effective at removing Mercury, Aluminum, and other harmful heavy metals.  

Vaccinations Contain Mercury & Aluminum

A recent (2-27-08) government panel suggested that all children ages 6 months to 18 years old should get the flu shot. This comes as vaccine makers are starting to phase out the use of Mercury in vaccinations. (Vaccines are still plenty harmful, see video) Flu shots however still contain Mercury, Formaldehyde, Aluminum, and other toxic materials and may be the main culprit for the epidemic rise of Autism, ADD, and other behavioral problems in our children.   Ask most doctors and they'll tell you that the small amount of Mercury in vaccinations is harmless and that studies prove no link between vaccinations and Autism and other behavioral problems.  That however is not true. Plenty of research has been conducted but has not been reported that has shown Mercury and the other toxins in vaccinations do cause autism and other behavioral problems in susceptible children, in particular boys who lack a gene to properly eliminate these toxins from their systems.  Here is clip from an article explaining that the CDC knew of the dangers of Mercury in vaccines years ago but did nothing except try and cover it up:

The Centers for Disease Control published a study last fall repudiating any possible link between thimerosal and developmental problems like autism in children. However, First Coast News has obtained non-published documents that show the CDC did have unpublished data supporting such a link-- but kept it from the public. Documents released through the Freedom of Information Act, detail the transcript of a meeting held in June of 2000 between members of the CDC, the FDA, and representatives from the vaccine industry. The group discusses the results of a February 2000 study that finds a significant association between exposure to thimerosal-containing vaccines, and developmental issues like autism in children.

Some of the comments--

"There are just a host of neurodevelopmental data that would suggest we've got a serious problem."

"My gut feeling? It worries me. I don't want my grandson to get a thimerosal-containing vaccine until we know better what's going on."

"We are in a bad position from the standpoint of defending any lawsuits."

"We have asked you to keep this information confidential."

And that's exactly what happened. Three years later, the CDC published a study in the November 2003 issue of "Pediatrics" contradicting the earlier results, and clearing thimerosal of any link to neurological problems in children.

"I just feel pretty strongly they haven't been honest in analyzing the problem."

So says Florida Congressman David Weldon, a physician. Weldon sent a letter to the head of the CDC in October of 2003, charging that data was selectively used in the "Pediatrics" study to make the earlier evidence of a mercury-autism connection disappear. He also asked for another review of the data. The CDC has not yet officially responded to Weldon's request.

Trust the big drug companies?  LOL. That's a good one!  Those who do so do so at their own peril.

Here are some other studies and information worthy of your consideration:

• A recent study found that elderly people who received a flu shot for at least 5 years in a row were 10 times more likely to develop Alzheimer disease. (Aluminum well known culprit)   
• Before Bush Sr became president, a child was required to get 3 shots before going into the 1st grade. Now they have to take over 23 shots including one within 24 hours of birth.   This wreaks havoc on the child's immune system.
• Mercury link to autism going back to 1940's. 
• FDA knew about the dangers of thimerosal back in the 70s and 80s.
• 1 in 60 boys in NJ now develops Autism.
• Amish kids don't get any shots, and they don't get autism. Coincidence? 
• There is a great video by Dr. Sherri J. Tenpenny called "Vaccines.  The Risks, the Benefits, the Choices. Watch Video   I believe not one person who watches this video would get another vaccination or allow their children to get any type of shot! 

But wait, if science can prove that a company no matter how large or "connected" causes any harm or damage, we can sue them and put them out of business, right?  Wrong!  After 911, a provision was added to the budget (without any debate) which gave the drug companies that produce vaccines immunity against ANY litigation in the midst of a mountain of science that ties vaccinations to the Autism epidemic.   Bush says that it's a "national security" issue. End of story.

Why would anyone do something that was going to adversely effect the health of another human being, especially the most innocent among us, children?  I believe their are multiple reasons and motives, but mainly, money, as in lots and lots of money.  Large amounts of money can cause a person to abandon their morals and do things they otherwise wouldn't dream of doing. Not all health professionals however are "on the take" as you'll soon see as many health professionals have been warning us about the dangers of fluoride for many years. (next subject)   Read what a former vaccine researcher had to say about vaccines, very eye opening.  Finally, for further reading, click here for a great treatise from a doctor on vaccines.  

We recommend that you take some time to thoroughly research vaccinations. Solution: If you want to opt-put of vaccinations for your children, check out our vaccination exemption forms.  Also, use our heavy metal test kit to see if you or your children have high levels of aluminum, Mercury, etc in your system.  If so, use one of our heavy metal detox products that have been clinically tested and proven effective at removing Mercury, Aluminum, and other harmful heavy metals.  

Toxic Waste By-Product of Making Aluminum: Fluoride

Mostly all countries that lack ties to the nuclear industry have outlawed the fluoridation of municipal water supplies. Chemtrails, vaccinations, and fluoride all have Aluminum in common.  Hydrofluoric Acid is a toxic byproduct of making aluminum, nuclear fuel, cement, and a few other industrial processes.  It's highly toxic.  To dispose of what we call fluoride would cost industry tens of billions of dollars a year.  The only known acceptable uses for fluoride?  It's the main ingredient in rat poison. 

How did water fluorination get started? (Click here for the long version and more info on the dangers of fluoride) Here is the short version. Back in the 1930's, the freemason Andrew Mellon who earlier founded Alcoa Aluminum got himself appointed Secretary of the Treasury.  What a nice guy!  He gave up the "high life" to serve the public.  Or perhaps there was another reason why Mr Mellon decided to take the job of Secretary of the Treasury?   If you answered, "Of course", you are correct.  You see, at that time, the US Public Health Service (USPHS) was under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Treasury .  Mellon also started the " Mellon Institute" to study the environment around this same time. In 1931, a Mellon Institute REPORT by Gerald Cox suggested that 1 PPM fluoride added to drinking water would be good for the teeth. That was it. No studies, no comparisons, no data, just a report by an organization funded by ALCOA. All previous research studies had shown that fluoride was toxic, and all studies since then suggest the same thing. The USPHS also sponsored some research put out by their Dr. HT Dean which manipulated data so that it "proved" that this same figure of 1 PPM resulted in reduction of tooth decay. So now there were two studies, one by Cox and one by Dean, both funded by agencies controlled by ALCOA, both supporting this arbitrary figure of 1 PPM fluoride that should be added to the water to lower tooth decay without even 1 study!  That was it. They've been dumping their toxic byproduct into our drinking water ever since. Rather than have to pay to dispose of the toxic waste they could now make money from their toxic waste!  What a deal, eh? It should be noted that tooth decay was already on the decline due to improved hygiene and that a recent long term study found that cities who do not fluorinate their water have the same amount of tooth decay as those who do fluorinate their water.  While fluoride applied to the teeth of post baby teeth children can do some good, putting fluoride into your stomach has never and will never do anything except slowly destroy your immune system and harm your brain.

We know that large amounts of money can cause anyone, even a health professional, to "sell their soul" to the devil. Not all health professionals however have sold out. Here are a few notable exceptions:

"When historians come to write about this period, they will single out fluoridation as the single biggest mistake in public policy that we've ever had." - Paul Connett, PhD, Biochemistry

"Water fluoridation is the single largest case of scientific fraud, promoted by the government, supported by taxpayer dollars, aided and abetted by the ADA and the AMA, in the history of the planet." - David Kennedy, DDS President International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology

"Sodium fluoride is a registered rat poison and roach poison. It has been a protected pollutant for a very long time." - William Hirzy, PhD President of the Union of Professional Employees of the EPA

"sodium fluoride is a very toxic chemical, acting as an enzyme poison, direct irritant and calcium inactivator ... .It reacts with growing tooth enamel and with bones to produce irreversible damage." - Granville Knight, MD president of the American Academy of Nutrition, Congressional Record, 31 July 56

"I am appalled at the prospect of using water as a vehicle for drugs. Fluoride is a corrosive poison that will produce serious effects on a long range basis. Any attempt to use water this way is deplorable."  - Charles Gordon Heyd, MD, president, AMA

"no physician in his right mind would hand to his patient a bottled filled with a dangerous drug with instructions to take as much or as little of it as he wished ... And yet, the Public Health Service is engaged upon a widespread propaganda program to insist that communities do exactly that ... The purpose of administering fluoride is not to render the water supply pure and potable but to contaminate it with a dangerous, toxic drug for the purpose of administering mass medication to the consumer, without regard to age or physical condition."  - L. Alesen, MD, president of the California Medical Association
Robotry, p14

"Fluoridation is the greatest fraud that has ever been perpetrated and it has been perpetrated on more people than any other fraud has." - Albert Schatz, PhD Nobel Laureate for discovering streptomycin quoted in Sutton's Fluoridation:The Greatest Fraud

"More people have died in the last 30 years from cancer connected with fluoridation than all the military deaths in the entire history of the United States."  - Dean Burk, PhD National Cancer Institute -- Fluoridation:A Burning Controversy

"Fluoridation is the greatest case of scientific fraud of this century, if not of all time." - EPA scientist, Dr. Robert Carton (Downey, 2 May 99)

Solution: Drink distilled, ozonated water. Use "Toms Natural Toothpaste". 

The Electromagnetic Radiation Poisoning of America

As if Chemtrails, Vaccinations, and Fluoride weren't bad enough, the most serious "population control" program being perpetrated against us at this time is EMF radiation poisoning from cell phone towers.  Don't expect to have this topic covered by the Media.   If the masses knew the health damage electromagnetic radiation was causing them there would be riots in the streets! 

What emits EMF?  All wireless devices (phones, internet, cell phones, etc) as well as most appliances and even wires in the walls.  However, the biggest threat comes from cell phone towers and new wireless technology that is being implemented as I write this (WiMAX) that will provide Internet coverage for 3000 square miles!  Exactly how long have we been under severe EMF attack?  For the most part, this "severe health threat" is a recent phenomena.  Prior to 1996, the wireless age was not coming online fast enough for big business primarily because communities had the authority to block cell phone towers quite easily. The Federal Communications Act of 1996 however changed all that and made it damn near impossible for communities to stop construction of cell phone towers "even if they posed a health threats to public health and the environment".  Isn't that special! 

For the past five decades, studies have confirmed that non-ionizing communications radiation in the RF/microwave spectrum has the same effect on human health as ionizing gamma wave radiation from nuclear reactions. (nukes)  Leading German radiation expert Dr. Heyo Eckel, an official of the German Medical Association, states, "The injuries that result from radioactive radiation are identical with the effects of electromagnetic radiation. The damages are so similar that they are hard to differentiate." .1  The identical damage resulting from both radioactive gamma waves and high frequency microwaves involves a pathological condition in which the nuclei of irradiated human cells splinter into fragments called micronuclei. Micronuclei are a definitive pre-cursor of cancer. During the 1986 nuclear reactor disaster at Chernobyl in Russia, the ionizing radiation released was equivalent to 400 atomic bombs, with an estimated ultimate human toll of 10,000 deaths. Exposed Russians quickly developed blood cell micronuclei, leaving them at high risk for cancer.

RF/microwaves from cell phones and cell tower transmitters also cause micronuclei damage in blood cells. This was reported a decade ago by Dr. Henry Lai and Narendrah Singh, biomedical researchers at the University of Washington in Seattle. Dr. Singh is famous for refining comet assay techniques used to identify DNA damage. Lai and Singh demonstrated in numerous animal studies that mobile phone radiation quickly causes DNA single and double strand breaks at levels well below the current federal "safe" exposure standards.2  The telecommunications industry knows this thanks to its own six-year, wireless technology research (WTR) study program mandated by Congress and completed in 1999. Gathering a team of over 200 doctors, scientists and experts in the field, WTR research showed that human blood exposed to cell phone radiation had a 300-percent increase in genetic damage in the form of micronuclei.   Dr. George Carlo, a public health expert who coordinated the WTR studies, confirms that exposure to communications radiation from wireless technology is "potentially the biggest health insult" this nation has ever seen. Dr. Carlo believes RF/microwave radiation is a greater threat than cigarette smoking and asbestos.

In 2000, European communications giant T-Mobile commissioned the German ECOLOG Institute to review all available scientific evidence in regard to health risks for wireless telecommunications. ECOLOG found over 220 peer-reviewed, published papers documenting the cancer-initiating and cancer-promoting effects of the high frequency radiation Employed by wireless technology. Many corroborating studies have been published since. Nobody however seems to be listening. Who's driving this bus anyway?

Because gamma waves and RF/microwave radiation are identically carcinogenic and genotoxic to the cellular roots of life, the safe dose of either kind of radiation is zero. No study has proven that any level of exposure from cell-damaging radiation is safe for humans. Dr. Carlo confirms that cell damage is not dose dependant because any exposure level, no matter how small, can trigger damage response by cell mechanisms.3  Recent Swedish epidemiological studies confirm that, after 2,000 hours of cellular phone exposure, or a latency period of about 10 years, brain cancer risk rises by 240 percent.4 Communications antennas now blast the human habitat with many different electromagnetic frequencies simultaneously. Human DNA hears this energetic cacophony loud and clear, reacting like the human ear would to high volume country music, R&B plus rock and roll screaming from the same speaker. Irradiated cells struggle to protect themselves against this destructive dissonance by hardening their membranes. They cease to receive nourishment, stop releasing toxins, die prematurely and spill micronuclei fragments into a sort of "tumor bank account."  This is precisely how microwave radiation prematurely ages living tissues.

NUKING THE WORK CREW

Here's one of many stories about a Cell Tower worker that drives the point home:

 
The constant roaming pain is intense for 32-year-old Kenneth Hurtado of Southern California. He's been to hell and back, starting with a seven-pound tumor on a kidney, diagnosed in 2002. The cancer spread to his brain. His first brain tumor was removed by craniotomy, the second by the cyber knife. In 2005, cancer nodes were found in his lungs. By 2006, the cancer had metastasized to his legs. This year he is battling three excruciating tumors on his spinal cord. Hurtado hates his seizures. His last one came on while he was driving. "It's like the devil taking over your body," he says.
 
Now unable to work, Hurtado says he was relatively healthy in 1998 when he began a career as an installer for a large international corporation manufacturing electronics equipment for wireless providers. At the base of cell towers there is an equipment "hut" where installers assemble the radios, amplifiers and filters which generate man-made microwave frequencies and route them up to transmitter antennas through huge cables. Mounted on sector supports aptly named alpha, beta and gamma, the antennas send and receive these carcinogenic radio waves and their pulsed data packets at the speed of light.
 
Posted on locked fences around the huts are "danger" warning signs. Hurtado says, "You look around these sites and you find many dead birds on the gravel. They can't take the radiation and they,ll just die. You don't have to ponder that too long to figure it's bad."
 
Hurtado doesn't know how much radiation he got on the job. He says there are at least four connection spots inside the hut where radiation can leak. He could not avoid the "heat" when he turned the radios on for testing and he wonders if his cancer is the result. "When I first got hired, we had safety meetings, but they pretty much minimized the hazards," he remembers. He was issued no electromagnetic safety clothing and it was not until 2002 that he got a radiation meter to wear. "The meter is supposed to warn you if you are getting too much radiation," he says, "but I put mine on a stick and placed it next to antennas and the alarm never went off."
 
A medical report in the International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health confirms that workers exposed to high levels of RF/microwave radiation routinely have astronomical cancer rates.   The report notes that, for these workers, the latency period between high radiation exposure and illness is short compared to less exposed populations.
Hurtado says there are many industry workers who are dangerously over-exposed. "I've talked to guys on power crews who have to climb around the antennas and they,ve told me that before a work day is half over, they start feeling really sick." He adds, "In my mind they are getting cooked."
 
Hurtado suspects that, since the early days of the wireless buildout, there has been illegal activity related to public exposure from transmission sites. "I'm pretty sure," he says, "that some of the carriers are exceeding FCC exposure limits. They can turn the radios and amplifiers up to get a bigger footprint and they don't care if the alarms go on once the installers are gone." Regulatory inspectors could identify violators because channels can be spectrum analyzed. "But," he says, "there is just no one to check and I believe that the public is getting way too much radiation now."

Why isn't anyone suing about this?  After passage of the Federal Communications Act, a group of scientists and engineers, backed by the Communications Workers of America, filed suit in federal court. They hoped the Supreme Court would review both the FCC's outdated exposure guidelines and the legality of a federal law that severely impedes state and local authority in the citing of hazardous transmitters. In 2001, the Supreme Court refused to hear the case. The group's subsequent petition to the FCC asking the agency to bring its exposure guidelines current with the latest scientific data was denied.  This is where we stand today. The public has no vote, no voice, no choice. Chronic exposure to scientifically indefensible levels of DNA-ravaging radiation is now compulsory for everyone in America.

Every citizen is now condemned to protect and defend himself against radiation assault as best he can. There have been a number of lawsuits against the radiation industry since cell towers began going up in backyards across the nation. In 2001, a group action lawsuit was filed in South Bend, Indiana, by families living in close proximity to towers. The complaint describes health effects suffered by the plaintiffs, including heart palpitations, interference with hearing, recurring headaches, short term memory loss, sleep disturbances, multiple tumors, glandular problems, chronic fatigue, allergies, weakened immune system, miscarriage and inability to learn. The South Bend suit was settled out of court on the basis of nuisance and decreased property values. Health claims don't hold water if emissions are within FCC exposure standards. This case is valuable for understanding the lunacy of FCC standards. The sick families enlisted the help of radiation consultant Bill Curry, who honed his expertise as an engineer for Argonne and Livermore labs. Dr. Curry found that one of the towers was irradiating homes at over 65 microwatt's per square centimeter.  This power density is well within federal exposure standards, which allow any neighborhood to be zapped with at least 580 microwatt's per square centimeter, or higher, depending on the frequencies. If the families were sick at 65 microwatt's/cm2 what would they be at 580? Considering that the Soviets used furtive Cold War microwave bombardment to make US embassy personal radiation-sick at an average exposure level of only .01 microwatt's/cm2, America's clear and present danger is obvious.

 
Recent health surveys in other nations confirm that people living close to wireless transmitters are in big trouble:
 
In 2002, French medical specialists found that people living close to cell towers suffered extreme sleep disruption, chronic fatigue, nausea, skin problems, irritability, brain disturbances and cardiovascular problems.5  
 
German researchers found that people living within 1,200 feet of a transmitter site in the German city of Naila had a high rate of cancer and developed their tumors on average eight years earlier than the national average. Breast cancer topped the list.6
 
Spanish researchers found that people living within 1,000 feet of cellular antennas had statistically significant illness at an average power density of 0.11 to 0.19 microwatt's /cm2, which is thousands of times less than allowed by international exposure standards.7
 
An Egyptian medical study found that people living near mobile phone base stations were at high risk for developing nerve and psychiatric problems, plus debilitating changes in neurobehavioral function. Exposed persons had significantly lower performance on tests for attention, short term auditory memory and problem solving.8
 
Researchers in Israel studied people in the town of Netanya who had lived near a cell tower for 3-7 years. They had a cancer rate four times higher than the control population. Breast cancer was most prevalent. 9
 
A new European Union poll of more than 27,000 people across the continent reveals that 76 percent of respondents feel that they are being made ill by wireless transmitters.   Seventy-one percent in the UK believe they suffer health effects from mast (cell tower) radiation. In April 2007, The London Times reported a startling number of cancer clusters in mast neighborhoods. One study in Warwickshire, found 31 cancers around a single street. 10  Some sick Brit's send their blood to a lab in Germany, which uses state of the art methodology to confirm wireless radiation damage.
 
Radiation sickness is now so prevalent in Germany that 175 doctors have signed the Bramberger Appeal, a document calling the situation a "medical disaster." It asks the German government to initiate a national public health investigation. This appeal closely follows the Freiburger Appeal, signed by thousands of German doctors who say they are dealing with an epidemic of severe and chronic diseases among both old and young patients exposed to wireless microwave radiation. The head of the cancer registry in Berlin found that one urban area with cellular antennas had a breast cancer rate seven times the national average.
 
Sweden was one of the first nations to go wireless. Swedish neuroscientist, Dr. Olle Johansson, with hundreds of published papers to his credit, says that a national epidemic of illness and disability was unleashed by the wireless revolution. Long periods of sick leave, attempted suicides and industrial accidents all increased simultaneously with introduction of mobile phone radiation. Ninety-nine percent of the Swedish population is now under duress of powerful third generation masts. Johansson reports that people are plagued with sleep disorders, chronic fatigue that does not respond to rest, difficulties with cognitive function and serious blood problems. Recurrent headaches and migraines are a "substantial public health problem," he says.
 
Rooftop transmitters, which readily pass microwave radiation into structures, can be a death sentence. Across the world there are reports of cancer clusters and extreme illness in office buildings and multi-tenant dwellings where antennas are placed on rooftops directly over workers and tenants. In 2006, the top floors of a Melbourne University office building were closed after a brain tumor cluster drew media attention to the risks of communications transmitters on top of the building. Likewise, ABC's Brisbane television complex, topped with satellite dishes and radio antennas, was the site of a well-publicized breast cancer cluster among workers.

Sprint-Nextel and Clearwire are now rolling out in U.S. cities tower-mounted WiMAX transmitters providing wireless internet access "to die for." WiMAX is WiFi on steroids. Upon startup of WiMAX transmitters near the Swedish village of Gotene, the emergency room at the local hospital was flooded by calls from people overcome with pulmonary and cardiovascular symptoms.11   WiMAX radiation could one day be cranked up to a bone-incinerating 66 gigahertz.  A single WiMAX tower could provide internet coverage for an area of 3,000 square miles, although coverage for 6-25 square miles is the norm now. Promoters say WiMAX may some day replace all cable and DSL broadband services and irradiate virtually all rural areas.  Yet, not a single environmental or public health study has been required as the industry unleashes infrastructure for this savage new wireless technology from which no living flesh will escape.

Recommended reading: The Body Electric    Also see:  Study on EMF dangers (PDF file)    and EMF Info Resources

There are solutions to the EMF and ELF problems facing us today.  We've invested in a sensitive EMF Meter and will soon post video's demonstrating the EMF danger spots that should be avoided as well as the lowest EMF producing appliances and products.  We're also going to soon sell EFM blocking materials that can be used to protect you from EMF exposure.

Chemtrails, vaccinations, water fluorination, and EMF's are all known to be detrimental to human health.  All three thing are tied to aluminum.  All three programs are pushed upon us by our government.  All three are known neurotoxin's that mostly hurt the very young and very old.  Now to answer the question, why are these harmful programs allowed by our government?  We believe the obvious answer is corporate greed with perhaps a population control, NWO agenda. Regardless of the reasons why, one must educate themselves on these subjects and take defensive measures to protect themselves and their families from this toxic assault. How can we do that?  1) Detoxify our bodies of heavy metals. (test yourself for heavy metals or Mercury)  2) Drink plenty of fluoride free ozonated water daily.  3) Purify our air to remove as many toxins and chemicals as possible. And 4) Supplement and follow a sensible diet and exercise program. We also recommend the Dr. Clark Protocol for those who suffer from serious health issues.

Please click on the links on this page to learn more. Feel free to give me a call (Mike) toll free at 800-549-9535 during business hours if you have any questions or information you'd like to share. I'm always eager to learn! 

1.   Interview with Dr. Eckel was published by Schwabischen Post 12-07-06. Find this interview at www.heseproject.org.  See "The Cell Nucleus is Mutating."

2. "Neurological Effects of Radio frequency Electromagnetic Radiation," a paper presented by Dr. Lai to the Mobile Phones and Health Symposium, October 25-28, 1998, University of Vienna. Also "DNA Damage and Cell Phone Radiation," www.rfsafe.com, 11-02-05.

3. "Health Social Services and Housing Sub-Panel Telephone Mast Review," a public discussion by Dr. George Carlo, 2-26-07. Find this excellent dissertation at www. safewireless.org.

4. "Long-Term Mobile Phone Use Raises Brain Tumor Risk: Study," Reuters, 03-31-06. This research was conducted by the Swedish National Institute for Working Life whose scientists studied 905 people with malignant brain tumors to confirm a 240% increased risk of brain tumors after heavy mobile phone use.

5. "Study of the health of people living in the vicinity of mobile phone base stations: I. influences of distance and sex," R. Santini et al, Institut National des Sciences Appliquées"laboratoire de biochimie-pharmacologie, 2002.

6. "Cancer Risks from Microwaves Confirmed," Dr. Mae-Wan Ho, Institute of Science in Society press release, 5-24-07.

7. "The Microwave Syndrome"a preliminary study in Spain," Navarro E. et al, Biology and Medicine, 22 (2 &3) 161-169, 2003; also " The Microwave Syndrome"Further Aspects of a Spanish Study," Oberfeld G et al 2004, International Conference Proceedings, Kos, Greece 2004.

8. "Neurobehavioral Effects Among Inhabitants Around Mobile Phone Base Stations," Abdel-Rassoul et al, Neurotoxicology, 8-01-2006.

9. "Increase of Cancer Near Cell-Phone Transmitter Station," Wolf D. and Wolf, International Journal of Cancer Prevention 1-2, April 2004.

10. "Cancer Cluster at Phone Masts, " Times On Line, The Sunday Times, UK 4-22-07.

11. "Swedes Hit Hard By WiMax, 6-12-06. This story says that the Swedish media  reported that in the town of Gotene, the hospital emergency room was flooded with calls regarding headaches, difficulty breathing, blurry vision and heart problems upon WiMAX start-up. At least 5 people had to leave their homes.